For the past decade I have been intrigued with discovering ways to tap into our students' innate interest in visual texts (film, media, graphic novels, photography, video games, etc.) to help them develop stronger literacy skills. While Kelly does discuss briefly the ways he uses graphic novels to enhance and develop reading, there has not been much discussion on the use of other visual texts, particularly film.
I think we as American educators are missing out on golden opportunities to capitalize on our students' visual and technology strengths and use those strengths to help them develop in areas of literacy where they may struggle. Besides the fact that our students need to be able to value and critique these ubiquitous visual texts in and of themselves, there is SO much potential and empirical research to support the use of these texts in constructive ways to develop strong reading and writing skills.
My particular research focuses on the ways nonfiction film can function as a mentor text for gifted adolescent writers and I have also conducted studies which include the reading and critical thinking connections.
I know that English teachers are notorious for abusing film in the classroom by simply showing a movie version of the book they just read while grading papers in the back with very little engagement occurring between student and film. What I propose is using film in the same way we should teach good literature. We should use film to discuss language and style, characters and plot, but mostly to examine the ways we tell stories and how our various modes of storytelling can inform and enlighten other forms.
I welcome your thoughts and experience in using film- both successful and unsuccessful, especially in relation to Kelly's book, Readicide.
To reiterate my main question: In what ways can film be used to help cure this growing epidemic of "Readicide"?
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This